×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 1 year old before posting.

Forum - View topic
Your Anime Rankings - Best of Winter 2023, Feb 5-11


Goto page 1, 2  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tanteikingdomkey



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Posts: 2347
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:02 am Reply with quote
LOOKS at graph......

WHY!!!

can someone please explain this volatility to me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Nom De Plume De Fanboy
Subscriber
Exempt from Grammar Rules


Joined: 14 Jan 2011
Posts: 615
Location: inland US west, pretty rural
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:49 am Reply with quote
One explanation is that week to week measurements are so volatile as to be meaningless. The cumulative, 'smoothed' measure is much better at showing what people find to be entertaining, imho.

Why the week to week ratings are so volatile, I don't know. Gaps in production I suspect are part of it this season. Personally, I feel that there is more variation in the types of shows this season, and I think there is more variation in 'quality' in general. But those are just my very subjective feelings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gina Szanboti



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 11458
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:02 am Reply with quote
I don't think we've ever seen swings like this across so many different series before in the weeklies. I'm thinking someone has figured out how to game the system without being detected by present safeguards and are just picking series at random to give a ridiculous boost or bombing for the fun of it. I'm watching over half of these series and there hasn't been the sort of quality or plot variations week to week to justify what we're seeing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stabman



Joined: 13 May 2015
Posts: 22
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 4:52 am Reply with quote
Haha, man those Blue Lock yo-yo rankings are insane.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHD



Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 1752
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:04 am Reply with quote
Stabman wrote:
Haha, man those Blue Lock yo-yo rankings are insane.

Just came to say that. Very Happy WTF is going on there? I just checked and neither episode 14 nor 16 were any worse than the others...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aerdra



Joined: 02 Feb 2022
Posts: 359
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 6:10 am Reply with quote
From the article notes:
Quote:
The rankings indicate relative quality (A is preferred to B), not absolute quality (B is good/bad). While the titles are ranked from 'best' to 'worst', sometimes the difference between #1 and #10 can be very thin.

Blue Lock had a community score of 4.0 for both episodes 14 and 16, higher than many other shows in those weeks, yet it ranked below most of them. This is probably because the number of viewers is relatively low, and people who gave good ratings to Blue Lock also gave better ratings to other shows.

The weekly rankings have always been volatile. One likely cause is the specific way rankings are calculated:
Quote:
The rankings are computed using the Schulze method, with the variation that unrated titles are considered as abstentions instead of lower than the rated titles.

Under the normal Schulze method, individual ballots are transitive, but not under this variation. A person who watches shows {A, B, C} and scores them respectively {4.5, 4.0, 3.5} creates a ballot that simultaneously expresses the preferences A > B > C and A = X = C (where X is an unwatched show).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Erulogos



Joined: 19 Apr 2021
Posts: 29
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 10:13 am Reply with quote
Tanteikingdomkey wrote:
LOOKS at graph......

WHY!!!

can someone please explain this volatility to me


My take on it is that this season is very bunched up in terms of quality and appeal. For example, the current bottom of the barrel shows Iceblade Sorceror and Ningen Fushin are more mid than garbage, while a number of other shows, even highly anticipated ones, have had some production and/or plotting missteps. When the season's rating are basically between 3 star and 5 star, even a half star off due to some budget saving animation or wonky pacing to try to get to the 'good stuff' can cause a huge swing, especially if it happens during a week when other similarly rated shows remain consistent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Angel M Cazares



Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 5466
Location: Iscandar
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:57 am Reply with quote
To me the cumulative rankings are a truer reflection of what the ANN community thinks. I usually ignore the weekly rannkings because they are not reliable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
q_3



Joined: 02 Sep 2015
Posts: 149
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:39 pm Reply with quote
I'm curious where Soaring Sky Precure ends up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v1cious



Joined: 31 Dec 2002
Posts: 6211
Location: Houston, TX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:11 pm Reply with quote
Poor High Card, that show is fun Sad

I don't get the hate for Trigun Stampede. While i get that it doesn't resemble the original series, what Orange manged to do with it is really good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
SHD



Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 1752
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:57 pm Reply with quote
v1cious wrote:
Poor High Card, that show is fun Sad

I don't get the hate for Trigun Stampede. While i get that it doesn't resemble the original series, what Orange manged to do with it is really good.

Agreeing on both counts, heh. I'm really enjoying High Card, it's one of my favorites of the season. I don't really get why it seems to be flying under most everyone's radar. (I guess for the pretty boy shipper crowd Buddy Daddies is a more obvious choice, though.)

And Trigun Stampede is I think doing a pretty good job at what it's trying to do. I understand that this is probably not flying well with people who want it to do something else, but as far as I, a fan of Trigun the manga and even more so the old anime, am concerned, it's a perfectly fine version of Trigun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverConvex
Subscriber



Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2381
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 6:16 pm Reply with quote
Aerdra wrote:
The weekly rankings have always been volatile. One likely cause is the specific way rankings are calculated:
Quote:
The rankings are computed using the Schulze method, with the variation that unrated titles are considered as abstentions instead of lower than the rated titles.

Under the normal Schulze method, individual ballots are transitive, but not under this variation. A person who watches shows {A, B, C} and scores them respectively {4.5, 4.0, 3.5} creates a ballot that simultaneously expresses the preferences A > B > C and A = X = C (where X is an unwatched show).


This is an odd feature of the ANN variant, although it's not obvious what alternative is better (since the usual method would seem to make it impossible for less watched but highly ranked shows to outcompete highly watched but less well ranked shows, unless I'm misremembering how the Schulze algorithm works).

Why do you think it would generate instability, though? Kind've interesting mathematical conjecture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aerdra



Joined: 02 Feb 2022
Posts: 359
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 8:30 am Reply with quote
NeverConvex wrote:
Aerdra wrote:
The weekly rankings have always been volatile. One likely cause is the specific way rankings are calculated:
Quote:
The rankings are computed using the Schulze method, with the variation that unrated titles are considered as abstentions instead of lower than the rated titles.

Under the normal Schulze method, individual ballots are transitive, but not under this variation. A person who watches shows {A, B, C} and scores them respectively {4.5, 4.0, 3.5} creates a ballot that simultaneously expresses the preferences A > B > C and A = X = C (where X is an unwatched show).


This is an odd feature of the ANN variant, although it's not obvious what alternative is better (since the usual method would seem to make it impossible for less watched but highly ranked shows to outcompete highly watched but less well ranked shows, unless I'm misremembering how the Schulze algorithm works).

Why do you think it would generate instability, though? Kind've interesting mathematical conjecture.

Hmm, now that you mention it, I'm starting to doubt my own conclusion. What I am sure of is that intransitivity in individual ballots increases the probability of intransitivity in the collective result, but I jumped to conclusions in suggesting that intransitivity implies sensitivity.

Perhaps a more likely explanation is that there are many shows with only a modest following, and there are many pairs of shows with relatively few common viewers. It's easy for these pairwise comparisons to change by large percentage margins - potentially creating/destroying/reversing strong Schulze paths - week to week.

I'm not sure whether the normal Schulze method or the ANN variation is better, either, since I can argue for both. Like you said, the normal method is highly disadvantageous to less-watched shows. On the other hand, choosing to not watch a show is also an indication of preference. I was thinking of a compromise of sorts: all unrated episodes are assigned a dummy score (no effect on average community score) of 2.0, but all comparisons with unrated episodes are given a reduced weight of 1/12th of a normal comparison.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Angel M Cazares



Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 5466
Location: Iscandar
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:36 pm Reply with quote
SHD wrote:
And Trigun Stampede is I think doing a pretty good job at what it's trying to do. I understand that this is probably not flying well with people who want it to do something else, but as far as I, a fan of Trigun the manga and even more so the old anime, am concerned, it's a perfectly fine version of Trigun.

Perfectly fine are pretty strong words for an adaption that isn't even following the manga faithfully.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
bassgs435



Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Posts: 305
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:49 pm Reply with quote
Angel M Cazares wrote:
SHD wrote:
And Trigun Stampede is I think doing a pretty good job at what it's trying to do. I understand that this is probably not flying well with people who want it to do something else, but as far as I, a fan of Trigun the manga and even more so the old anime, am concerned, it's a perfectly fine version of Trigun.

Perfectly fine are pretty strong words for an adaption that isn't even following the manga faithfully.

This is the thing: It's not suppossed to be following the manga. It's not an adaptation in the modern sense of the word. But more in the style of older works like every Getter anime before Arc, the Cutie Honey shows, Devilman Crybaby (this is one is a mix of faitthfulness and it's own ideas) or the Mazinger anime
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group